Conclusion
The lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs against the transfer of the venue of the hearing and against Mr. Dahari is hereby dismissed. In view of the scope of the case, the manner in which the plaintiffs proceeded and the multitude of such requests, which obliged the transfer of the venue of the Mu'alem and Mr. Dahari hearing to defend against a claim whose financial scope and management is complex, I find that the plaintiffs be ordered to be charged, jointly and severally, with expenses in the amount of ILS 120,000 in favor of the transfer of a concealed hearing venue, and an additional ILS 40,000 in favor of Mr. Dahari. The reduced expenses ruling in favor of Mr. Dahari is the result of his conduct as described above.
At the same time, I order that defendants 1 and 4, jointly and severally, be charged the sums detailed above (in the chapter entitled, "The Arithmetic Result - the Sums Paid by the Plaintiffs to Defendant 4, minus the sums they received for restitution and the right to initiate"), to the various plaintiffs, each according to his share. On the basis of the procedural conduct as described, of the plaintiffs on the one hand and of defendants 1 and 4 on the other, as well as on the basis of the scope of the amount awarded in favor of the plaintiffs as opposed to the amount they claimed, I have not found it necessary to make an order for expenses in the relationship between the plaintiffs and defendants 1 and 4.
The Secretariat will send a copy of the judgment to the parties, and will close the proceeding with the court records.
Granted today, November 16, 2025, in the absence of the parties.