A: The tenant here also received a benefit from the state, the tenant gets the right to buy an apartment at a price that is very low than the market price, yes, the state made it happen and it doesn't want people to start... They will enjoy the benefit and tomorrow they will sell the apartment, we want people to live there, not to turn it into a secondary market, it's for the purpose because they are homeless.
Q: So as you just mentioned, you're basically saying that the goal of the reduced price is that this reduced price will roll over to the homeless, right?
A: That's right, that's the price he offered.
Q: Wasn't the goal that the person who would benefit from the same reduced price compared to the market prices would be the developer?
A: I think he also enjoyed it, he didn't just submit a bid for a tender, but his bid in the tender, yes, that's the lower price for the tenant,
Q: No, but he doesn't enjoy the difference in the market price for the sale of an apartment because you've already set the 2 parameters for him, you've set the price of the land and also set the maximum price he can sell to a third party in order to pass that discount on to a third party, right?
[....]
A: You have to remember that the price for the land is not the market price, the price of the land that we set is a reduced price, it is a very low price, it is 20 percent...
Q: That's the assumption we're talking about, obviously.
A: That's right. And as a result, he priced his offer.
Q: But who did you want to benefit from this discount, you had a trend in the tender to benefit entrepreneurs, with...
A: No, the trend is... I said that the tenants would receive an apartment price lower than the market value.