It follows, therefore, that in practice, the ILA and the Ministry of Construction and Housing continue to be "tied to the navel" of the land and the apartment buyers, and do not sever contact with them, even after the "lease contract" was signed between the ILA and the appellant. The state continues to control and supervise the land and its use, not only after the lease agreement, but also after the sale of the apartment to the eligible buyer, who won the lottery and for a period of five years from the date of purchase of the "Buyer's Price" apartment.
Moreover, the state has the power to order the cancellation of a sale contract of a "Buyer's Price" apartment in a situation in which the eligible purchaser who won the lottery does not fulfill the conditions of eligibility or sells the "Buyer's Price" apartment not in accordance with the terms of the sale contract.
- In addition, the appellant cannot initiate actions to change the zoning plan or promote a new zoning plan. Even if the scope of rights in the land has increased as a result of the actions of a third party, the appellant cannot benefit from the increase in rights without prior written approval from the ILA, and in such a case, all she can do is act in accordance with the conditions set for the construction and sale of "Mehir LaMishtaken apartments".
- The construction of the apartments themselves is subject to a rigid and meticulous framework, since that the appellant is obligated to build the apartments and buildings in accordance with the binding specifications set by the state. Thus, the State determines the maximum area of the apartments, as well as each and every component in the apartment – every door hinge, every floor, every toilet and every electrical outlet – everything is determined in the binding specifications – dimensions, shades, location, quantity and contents – and the appellant must comply with everything set out in the binding specifications, while the control company carefully examines its compliance with these specifications. The appellant is also not entitled to change anything from the specifications. The purchaser can request to waive specific and defined components, and in such a case the appellant must financially credit him with the ownership of those components that he waived.
According to the terms of the contractual system signed by the appellant, the state prevented the appellant from offering and making additions and upgrades to the "Buyer's Price" apartment for the eligible purchasers beyond the mandatory specifications for an additional fee, and this During the construction and until the key to the apartment is handed over to the eligible buyer.