Adv. Arbiv: When,
Mr. Greenbaum: On the day we got the apartment and saw that the apartment had a terrible smell of cigarettes and it was broken and torn with 5 big dogs inside and that the sofas were not usable and the tables were not usable and the only thing left there was actually mine which was a refrigerator that also didn't work and we had to fix it but since it is an integral part of the kitchen we didn't dismantle it"
- And later on (Tax Appeal 14 of par, paras. 2-10):
"Adv. Arbiv: An appendix was attached to the sale agreement because it was an integral part of the sale agreement, as far as I'm concerned, if you didn't pay for the appendix you didn't pay for the sale agreement, it's a breach, and you got the essential things, the investigation is maybe I'll tell, I don't think you wanted to use them either, it's not something interesting, but (it's not clear) you got them, why didn't you pay? Because your lawyer sent a letter canceling the appendix, do you think that on that basis you can not pay?
Mr. Greenbaum: No, so everything that could have been dismantled from the house was dismantled, the elevator could not be dismantled, but anything that could have been removed from the place without causing more damage to the house was dismantled and waiting for you in the warehouse of the Execution Office."
- The plaintiff further stated (Tax Appeal 27, paras. 16-17):
"You have to remember for a moment that the appendix to the agreement included furniture in the apartment. Two years after I managed to evict the defendants, the furniture was in an unusable state, so I was not interested in it. I gave you two weeks to pick it up when we finally moved it to the warehouse, and I think it's still waiting for you there. Unless you take it out"
The plaintiff further added (Tax Appeal 27, paras. 21-24):
"You have to understand that there were two years that she lived in the apartment and destroyed it. We didn't get the apartment we bought. She destroyed it consciously. It's very possible that she tried to get into Moshe, which is some kind of private war of theirs, but in the end we absorbed it. We didn't get a house that resembled the house we bought. It really wasn't the same"
- With regard to the elevator that was part of the contents agreement and which is connected by a permanent connection, the plaintiff noted (Tax Appeal 17, paras. 14 onwards):
"The witness, Mr. Greenbaum: I didn't get them. I received a very small portion of them, and today you have an opportunity to show me what their value is.