Civil Case (Economic) 15200-05-11 Maya Frischer v. Technological Assignments (1997) inTax Appeal (published in the Legal Databases, [published in Nevo] on September 12, 2011).
- After considering the state of affairs, considering that this is a lawsuit against the same parties (except for the company's CEO - Mr. Sagi Niv and I do not examine the need to add him in the framework of this application) and on the other hand, considering that this is a counterclaim that is independent; in view of the amount of the counterclaim (ILS 1,250,000) and in view of Atidim's concern that if its claim is accepted, it will be left with a broken trough and its claims that there has been a change in the company's ownership and that the only director is a foreign citizen (these claims were raised in the framework of the response to the response and Workspace was not given the opportunity to respond to them), hereby instructs Workspace to deposit a guarantee to secure the Applicants' expenses in the sum of ILS 100,000, which will be deposited within 30 days of the issuance of this decision.
- In the margins of the matter, but not in the margins of their importance, it is clarified to the parties that if an order is issued to open proceedings in the framework of the insolvency proceedings, this will delay the clarification of this proceeding, and there will be room to petition an appropriate application in order to continue to clarify the claim and the counterclaim. The court must be informed upon receipt of a decision by the insolvency court and attached to this case.
- I have not found at this stage to address the additional request that if the guarantee is not deposited on time, the claim will be rejected. If necessary, an appropriate request will be submitted for my review and this will be forwarded for a lawful response.
- The Secretariat will communicate my decision to the attention of the parties and their counsel and will close Request No. 20 in the case.
Granted today, December 29, 2020, in the absence of the parties.