Adv. Zilber: Do you know what you're saying, what Erez is saying?
The witness, Mrs. Kehati: He says he should. His land deserves from us.
Adv. Zilber: And he deserves it?
The witness, Mrs. Kehati: Listen, I said to my son, you have a huge garden here, do whatever you want.
Adv. Zilber: Who did you say that to?
The witness, Mrs. Kehati: Erez has 6 children here, 2.5 rooms or 3 small ones, it's not a one-time I've come with.
Adv. Zilber: So in fact, do you agree that he will get what the court ruled the 34 meters that he deserves, that he will get that he will move the fence wherever he wants and you agree to that, what the court ruled 34 meters?
The Honorable Judge Barkai: Okay.
The witness, Mrs. Kehati: Listen, I can say yes to my eyes, but I have another little boy outside Elad, he will see what he will tell me.
Adv. Zilber: Elad tells you what to say or you?
The witness, Mrs. Kehati: No, he'll say, Elad honey".
And what did Elad say that the defendant clarifies that he will kiss something? More on this in the next paragraph.
- Elad Kehati "joined" the dispute after the judgment was handed down inCivil Case 49046-03-20. In this regard, Elad Kehati was asked and answered as follows (Tax Appeal 53, paras. 14-16, emphases not original):
"Adv. Zilber: Okay, another question you wrote in your affidavit, let's start like this, you You were not present at the hearing in which the consent was obtained correctly?
The witness, Mr. L. Kehati: True
It was clear from the testimony of Elad Kehati that the attempt to "return" to the plaintiffs an area detached from their land stemmed from the defendant's desire to preserve the achievements of the land theft. Elad Kehati detailed how a housing unit was built on the stolen land, or near it, and did not hesitate to claim that the return of the stolen land would harm the defendant, and in his words - "it really causes problems." Elad Kehati was asked and answered as follows (Tax Appeal 49-50 of the Protocol):