In the contract concluded with Mr. Attias, it was stated that the amount of consideration was ILS 10,000, and in the contract entered into with Ms. Vyshiovsky, it was stated that the amount of consideration was ILS 30,000. However, in practice, it was claimed that the amounts paid were higher as detailed above, while Goren argued that "Israeli custom" (section 3(i) of the lawsuit) is to pay part of the consideration in cash without reporting to the tax authorities. Mr. Attias and Mrs. Vyšyovsky were of the opinion, "after examining the matter" (section 3(j) of the claim), that if the land was thawed for construction, an expropriation would be carried out at the rate of 40% of the size of the plot, and that they would also receive compensation for this expropriation.
It was argued that at no stage did the transfer of the place of discussion mention that clause 15 was included in the agreement for the lease of the land from the Administration, according to which in the event of a change in the designation of the lessee the lessee the manager would be entitled to an early termination of the lease period of the lessee, and that the lessee would be entitled to compensation for the lease right for agricultural cultivation only (hereinafter interchangeably: "clause 15 of the lease contract" or the "restitution clause"). The existence of the lease contract, and in particular clause 15 of the contract, which allows the ILA to return the land in the event of a change of designation, became known to Mr. Attias and Ms. Vyševsky only at the end of 2016, "by chance" (clause 3(13) of the claim). If Mr. Attias and Ms. Vyszewski had been aware of the possibility that the Administrator would return the land to him in the event of a change of designation, they would not have purchased the land.
Transferring the venue of the hearing, Goren sold to Mr. Attias and Mrs. Vyšovsky the aforesaid parcels of land, at the same time that he served as their counsel, including for the purpose of transferring the rights in the registry. Admittedly, Goren noted to the buyers that they can hire other legal representation services, but at the same time added that "due to the simplicity of the contract, there is no need for this and they can rely on him as he is a veteran and experienced lawyer..." (Section 4(g) of the claim).