Either way, Junger's claim that in 2016 he realized that we had "fallen into a trap" (paragraph 18 of his affidavit) is puzzling. Given my conclusion that the transfer of the Goren hearing venue conveyed to the court the contracts, including clause 15, the claim that the transfer of the Goren hearing venue concealed clause 15 from the plaintiffs is not clear. The plaintiffs did not meet the transfer of the Goren hearing place at all and did not speak with him prior to the signing of the contracts. Since their counsel for Mualem knew about the contract and clause 15, the causal connection between the transfer of the Goren hearing place and the plaintiffs was severed, since the transfer of the meeting place Goren could have assumed that the transfer of the meeting place from Mualem would inform the plaintiffs 3-7 of the matter, as he did. In addition, attribution of liability for prima facie representations at the pre-contractual stage or for misleading the opposing party, can most likely be done from the perspective of plaintiffs 3-7 only with respect to the transfer of a concealed hearing venue, but I have already determined that he informed them about section 15 and its implications.
Plaintiff 6 - Sidon Construction
Mr. Benya Sidon, one of the two representatives of plaintiffs 3-7 as they claimed (paragraph 4(d) of Mr. Horowitz's affidavit; paragraph 5 of the affidavit of the transfer of the place of Cohen's hearing), repeated the factual version of the other members. The question marks and perplexities that were raised in relation to the other plaintiffs are also valid in his case, as explained. We will add that with regard to the registration of a lower sum in the contract, Mr. Sidon said, "At the time of the act, it seemed to me, you know, that it was okay..." (p. 1187, s. 15-16) and that "at the time of this act, something very small appeared" (ibid., p. 1188, s. 5). Mr. Sidon's claim that false registration in the contract and false reports to the tax authorities are a "reason" or a "very small" matter is astonishing. Mr. Zidon even writhed with incoherent answers as to the question of whether the transfer of the place of discussion from Mualem took part in the counting of the funds in his office, and whether he even saw the counting (p. 1201, question 1 to p. 1202, question 12). Mr. Zidon did not see the transfer of the Goren hearing place before the signing of the contract, nor did he ask to see it, after according to him, Mr. Dahari stated that he was not interested in meeting the purchasers (p. 1246, question 16 to p. 1247, question 1).