In this context, Mr. Shimoni "took the awl out of the bag" when he admitted that the reason why the plaintiffs did not file the lawsuit at the time was due to the fact that "in order to file the lawsuit, you incriminate yourself" (p. 1558, paras. 21-22; Ibid., p. 1567, paras. 19-21). Plaintiff No. 3, Mr. Horowitz, also testified, "I organized the people for this lawsuit because people did not want to sue the seller because of the issue of the illegal transaction" - p. 51, s. 36 to p. 52, s. 1; Ibid., p. 91, paras. 5-7). In other words, the reason why the plaintiffs chose to refute Mr. Zidon's claims in 2012 is the fear that they will be required to file a lawsuit, at the same time that they themselves committed an offense by way of submitting false reports to the tax authorities (Mr. Shimoni tried to correct his answer, but his late and convoluted words deserve to be postponed - ibid., at p. 1568, paras. 23 to p. 1572, para. 14).
Mr. Shimoni further claimed, "I did not know that it was a lease contract" (p. 1485, question 11), even though in the contract signed by his wife it was explicitly stated that "the seller is the owner of the lease rights from the Israel Lands Administration" (since the first of the contract).
In fact, Mr. Shimoni often replied that he did not remember various details that he did not find comfortable even after the contract was signed, but he was surprised to remember that at the time the contract was signed, Mualem did not tell him about clause 15. Thus, Mr. Shimoni did not remember whether he told his wife when Mr. Sidon raised the concern that they would take the land from them, even though this issue is at the heart of his wife's claim (p. 1514, question 4); It is not recalled that the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the transfer of Goren's hearing place in the Jerusalem Magistrate's Court in matters related to this lawsuit, and that their claim was dismissed while charging them expenses (p. 1515, s. 18 and p. 1516, s. 10); He did not recall where he derived his claim that Mr. Dahari relied on another person when he told Mr. Zidon that there was no chance that the manager would take the land back (p. 1533, paras. 10-18); He did not remember whether they went to Mr. Dahari's office after the contracts were signed (p. 1547, question 4-6), and whether they counted the money there again (p. 1434, question 5); He did not recall whether it was possible to see the foyer from the office of Mualem, with regard to the question of whether Mu'alem saw the plaintiffs counting the money in his office (p. 1550, question 19) and whether Mualem was present at the time of the money being counted (p. 1433, paras. 14-15); He did not recall whether he had asked the transfer of a place of discussion what would happen in a situation in which the designation of the land would be changed (p. 1437, paras. 8-9); He did not remember whether he knew before the signing of the contracts that Goren was the seller (p. 1512, question 4), even though he had heard about these transactions from the son of a member of Knesset and others, and he certainly knew who the seller was.