I would also like to emphasize that I am convinced that the transfer of the Goren hearing place determined the price of each unit of land, and that Mr. Dahari acted in accordance with his commandments. I did not find it acceptable to accept the argument of the relocation of the Goren meeting venue because Mr. Dahari demanded from the purchasers higher sums than those that he transferred to the Goren Hearing Place. The recording that was submitted to the court between the transfer of Goren's venue and Mr. Sidon, as well as the recording between Goren's relocation and Mr. Attias, clearly prove that Goren knew very well that the sums written in the contracts did not reflect the sums he actually received. Had Goren indeed been transferred to the venue of the hearing, he would have received the sums written in the contracts only, it is presumed that he would have expressed resentment to his interlocutors. Instead, Goren sounded quite relaxed in those conversations when it came to the considerations that the speakers noted they had paid.
It is also worth noting that after the transfer of the venue of the hearing, Goren attached to his affidavit of his main witness an affidavit dated April 29, 2013, signed by Mr. Dahari. In the affidavit, Mr. Dahari allegedly declares that the sums specified in the contracts signed with the purchasers, including the plaintiffs, were the sums actually paid. However, I was persuaded that the amounts recorded in the contracts were lower than the amounts actually paid. Therefore, to the extent that Mr. Dahari signed the affidavit, it is regrettable that Goren signed an affidavit whose contents do not correspond to reality. On the other hand, to the extent that Mr. Dahari did not sign the affidavit, it is clear that the attachment of the document to the affidavit of the main testimony of the witness was transferred to the place of the Goren hearing. Either way, I am persuaded that Mr. Dahari transferred all the funds he received from the purchasers to the Goren Hearing Place, and that he did not pocket some of them as claimed by the Goren Hearing Place. (Regarding the scope of the sums paid by the plaintiffs for the Goren Hearing Place, which does not correspond to the amounts recorded in the contracts, see more: Goren-Atias's recorded conversation of Goren-Atias on August 21, 2011, Appendix N/15, p. 7, s. 19 to p. 8, s. 8; The convoluted and incomprehensible version of Goren's relocation of the place of discussion in his interrogation at p. 1592, questions 7-21, at p. 1594, questions 1-15, at p. 1601, questions 22-24, at p. 1602, questions 8 to 1622, questions 6; paragraphs 1-18 of the plaintiffs' summaries).