Early planning - Counsel for the accuser argued that Fischer concocted a planned and multi-stage process with Hassan, which was built layer by layer, from the initial offer to Hassan, through Fischer's meetings with him in the office, to the meeting between them at the café in Ashdod, where Hassan arrived with the file that was predicted to contain the bribe money.
Fisher's relative role in the commission of the offense - The accuser sees the Hassan case as a step up on Fischer's part in this aspect as well. According to her, Fischer was dominant in the affair, and served as a central and vital axis, in the sense of a no-nonsense party, who initiated and created the event. In terms of Fischer's criminal intentions, he even managed to persuade Hassan to pay the bribe. Malka would not have been able to carry out his actions without the involvement of Fischer, who illegally received the information from Malka and used it against his client, Hassan, while acting as a link between the senior police officer and the client.
The damage that was expected to be caused and caused by the commission of the offense - The accuser believes that there is little question about whether Hassan was at real risk in the affairs that Fisher promised to eliminate with the bribe money that Hassan would pass on to the policeman through him. This is because there is no dispute that the money that Fisher tried to broker for the queen was in favor of an action related to the role of a queen, which amounts to a deviation from the line. Common sense and life experience teach that such an action can be of great benefit to the person for whom it is done. However, even without such a benefit, it is sufficient that the bribe money was intended to bring Malka to some action and..."There is no difference between it... If he was taken in order to deviate from the line in the performance of his duties or in favor of an action that the public servant was obliged to perform according to his position" (section 293(7) of the Penal Law). The very fact that Malka was placed in a situation where he was expected to act within the framework of his position in exchange for the bribe money caused actual damage and great damage to the public's trust in the government systems, the integrity of public servants, and the proper functioning of the public administration. The actions of Fisher and Malka have tarnished not only them individually, but also the law enforcement systems and the public servants who serve in them. Enforcement systems, which must remain clean, have suffered irreparable damage as a result of Fischer's actions, which in many ways is seen as an internal factor, 'Officer of the Court", who represents in the courts and maintains ongoing working relations with the enforcement and investigation agencies. In order to blunt or somehow blur the stain that has been caused, real and tangible punishment is required. As for the potential damage, the execution of the plan conceived by Fisher was prevented only because of Hassan's resourcefulness and willingness to disclose the events to the authorities, and not because of any data related to Fischer, who did everything in his power to complete the acts, and even warned Hassan not to tell anyone about the proposal, telling him that it would only be discovered.Everyone goes to prison and for many years"; To teach you that Fisher was already aware in real time of the seriousness of the acts and the expected punishment for them. In any case, the potential damage is also deep, severe and widespread, since it is impossible to exclude the possibility that Hassan would not have disclosed the bribe offer, and in such a scenario Hassan's investigations would have been disrupted as a result of the transfer of the bribe through Fischer.