(f) The amount of money transferred to Ben-Eliezer is far from unusual in the landscape of the defendant's economic life - As was clarified above, there was no real dispute that the defendant is a wealthy businessman, whose real estate assets owned by him (and his partners) abroad are estimated at tens of millions of dollars (Prov. p. 1487, para. 20), so it can be said that a loan of the amount in question, even if it does not involve interest, is not unusual in the landscape of his economic life. Moreover, in examining the scope of the "gift", consideration must be given to the question of whether it is a "grant" or perhaps a "loan", and in our case, as clarified above, Ben-Eliezer's demand was to receive a loan, and this is how the defendant also relates to it at the point in time when he gave it to Ben-Eliezer.
(g) The absence of any concealment activities is also consistent with the defendant's honest and authentic statements when he was interrogated by the police, when he told about the matter on his own initiative, even before he was asked about the matter, and even before his "official" interrogation began - The fact that the defendant disclosed the transfer of the funds to Ben-Eliezer on his own initiative, even before his official investigation began, and described that the loan was given on the basis of my friendship and in view of Ben-Eliezer's alleged medical condition, remained solid during his interrogations, as well as during the trial (see also the prosecution's statements in its summaries: "As noted, the defendant did not change anything from the basic version given in the open part of his interrogation, neither in response to the indictment nor during the trial" – paragraph 157 of the summaries of the claim). It should be noted that although the defendant revealed in his interrogation that Ben-Eliezer had assisted B&E (without the investigators knowing so much), from the very first moment he vehemently denied any connection between that assistance and that loan. In my previous remarks, I noted the cry of innocence that characterized the defendant's version, the honesty that was reflected in his words in his interrogation with the police, and the manner in which this honesty was also reflected in his conduct in court, including during his testimony, and we can only repeat the words.