(2) I will put it this way: from the broad perspective proposed by my colleague, which includes the same "broad territorial affinity", and it seems to me as well, it is appropriate to define the place where the offense was committed in the global village also through the lens of the destination of the offense, the place to which it was intended, the place of residence of its victims; See sections 14-13 to the Penal Law. Indeed, there is no denying that this is a change in thought and a certain deviation from what has been done so far, but we have come this far in light of the developments between the two countries.-Nationalism. It is plain that the Attorney General, and of course the courts, is presumed to give their opinion at all times on the nature of the requesting state; In our case, we are dealing with the United States, a country with a legal system in which there is no real concern that there will be no fair trial and that the appellant's rights will not be preserved. This is despite the fact that there is no denying that the law in the United States is not exactly Israeli law. However, even if there is a real - And I will not set rivets - The appellant's arguments regarding the difference in the laws of evidence and the procedure do not reach a level that confirms the fear of a fair trial and the violation of his rights. The weighted balances point in the direction of my colleague's judgment.
(3) The learned counsel for the appellant affirmed his constitutional rights according to Section 5 To the Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty, which states that "no person's liberty shall be taken away and shall not be restricted by imprisonment, detention, extradition or in any other way." However, the basic answer to this is found In section 8 of the Basic Law, and indeed the The Extradition Law intended for the proper purpose of enforcement and cooperation between-In any case, even according to the situation following the amendments to this law, it is consistent with the values of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. As for the values of the state