Therefore, all the elements of the offense of assaulting a public servant in aggravated circumstances were proven.
Conclusion
- For the reasons detailed above, I convict the defendant of the following offenses:
In the first charge - an act of terror of sabotage with aggravated intent, under section 329(a)(2) of the Penal Law, together with section 37 of the Counter-Terrorism Law (3 offenses); operation with a weapon for the purpose of terrorism under section 30 of the Counter-Terrorism Law; a terrorist act of arson under section 448(a) of the Penal Law, together with section 37 of the Counter-Terrorism Law (3 offenses); in the second charge - carrying a weapon under section 144(b) of the Penal Law; arson under section 448(a) a clause to the Penal Law; The third charge - carrying a weapon under section 144(b) of the Penal Law; arson under section 448(a) of the Penal Law (two offenses); In the fourth charge - carrying a weapon under section 144(b) of the Penal Law; arson under section 448(a) of the Penal Law; and in the fifth charge - assaulting a public servant under aggravated circumstances under section 382a(b)(1) of the Penal Law.
Granted today, February 08, 2026, in the presence of the parties