The witness, Mr. Jorgenson: All customers are under my responsibility.
Adv. Fruchtman: All customers are under your warranty.
The witness, Mr. Jorgenson: All of the company's customers.
Adv. Fruchtman: Yes but I'm only talking to you about the specific customers.
The witness, Mr. Jorgenson: These customers? They are under my responsibility.
(p. 78)
- The defendant worked for the defendant with many customers in the Irish and English markets, with whom he worked for the plaintiff:
77"D. Fruchtmann: It's true that with some of these clients you still work today in"Kulamed"?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: True.
77"D. Fruchtmann: Can you give me the names of the clients you've worked at"Moonshot" And you are working today in"Kulamed"?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: I can elaborate here?
77"D. Fruchtmann: So let's elaborate, please..
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: William Hill, Mr.Q, 888.
77"D. Fruchtmann: IVbrand?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: IV, betfred, That's what costs me.
77"D. Fruchtmann: Conquestador?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: Doesn't work with them today, But we worked, Doesn't work with them. I worked with them.
77"D. Fruchtmann: But you've worked with them in"Moonshot" And you worked with them in"Kulamed"?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: Yes.
77"D. Fruchtmann: and-Leovegas?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: Yes.
77"D. Fruchtmann: Yes. Both and. and-sunvegas?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: Yes.
77"D. Fruchtmann: Both and. and-32red?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: Yes.
77"D. Fruchtmann: Yes. Both and. and-unibet?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: 32red and-unibet It's the same company.
(p. 59 of P)
- It was not proven that these were the defendant's clients in the field of appellation before the defendant began working for the defendant.
- One of the defendant's founders had experience with the plaintiff's clients and the defendant tried to show that she has a background in the field of appellation and has been active since 2020 (paragraphs 4, 61 of Oz's affidavit). The defendant did not prove her claim. In addition, despite the defendant's claim that Play is her client, the plaintiff presented that on August 28, 2022, Eliran Uzan contacted Mr.Play, who is a client of the plaintiff, who confirmed to him that the defendant had contacted him and connected him with the defendant (Appendix 13 to Eliran's affidavit):
If so, it was proven that the defendant approached this client of the plaintiff.
- It was proven that the defendant contacted the plaintiff's customers (p. 61 of the p.) and spoke with the suppliers' contacts when he began working for the defendant:
77"D. Fruchtmann: Now it's true that you meant-50 Customer Contacts "Moonshot" In Ireland?