The witness, Mr. Oz: I didn't know that. As soon as we moved forward with them, they asked to add a clause of legal defense, and then I assumed that was what was there.
Adv. Fruchtman: You assumed that there was a problem. Who asked to add the legal defense clause?
The witness, Mr. Oz: I remember, I'm not sure, Lankri.
(p. 86)
- Moreover, the defendant and the other employees will inform the defendant about the limitation clause:
77"D. Fruchtmann: I got it, so tell me a moment, If you didn't show them the clause and didn't show them that there is, then why did the three of you ask for indemnification and legal protection??
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: Because there was someone with me in the negotiations who was"IV, He also consulted with his uncle and we realized that it could be one of the following:Boxes They lied after that.
77"D. Fruchtmann: I understood that already in the negotiations you spoke and told them that there are such clauses and therefore you are asking for proper indemnification?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: It could be.
77"D. Fruchtmann: It could be. Do you pay fees for representation in this lawsuit of "Moonshot" Or just "Kulamed" Paying?
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: I don't pay.
77"D. Fruchtmann: You don't pay. "Kulamed" Paying.
The Witness, Mr. Jorgenson: Indeed.
(p. 63)
- Knowingly - the defendant knew that there was a non-compete clause in the plaintiff's employment agreement with the defendant, nevertheless she transferred to her the defendant who contracted with the plaintiff's clients knowing that by these acts she was breaching the defendant's agreement with the plaintiff:
Adv. Fruchtman: And confirm to me that you knew that the Lankri employment agreement contains acceptable obligations of confidentiality, non-competition, and restriction of contacting clients.
The witness, Mr. Oz: I didn't know that. As soon as we moved forward with them, they asked to add a clause of legal defense, and then I assumed that was what was there.