Below is a comparison table between the sums to which the plaintiff was entitled and the amounts paid:
| Antitrust for payment in ILS | Antitrust paid in ILS slip (regular, extra and Saturday) | Difference in ILS | |
| Aug-21 | 6,275.4 | 6,246 | -29.4 |
| Sep-21 | 7,596.7 | 8,445 | 848.3 |
| Oct-21 | 6,348.2 | 6,246 | -102.2 |
| Nov-21 | 6,275.4 | 6,246 | -29.4 |
| Dec-21 | 6,581.1 | 6,538 | -43.1 |
| Jan-22 | 3,640.0 | 3,494 | -146.0 |
| Feb-22 | 5,428.0 | 5,275 | -153.0 |
| March-22 | 6,586.6 | 6,616 | 29.4 |
| Apr-22 | 4,357.1 | 4,208 | -149.1 |
| May-22 | 6,411.5 | 6,712 | 300.5 |
| Antitrust | 59,499.8 | 60,026 | 526.2 |
- On the basis of the above, we determine that despite the errors in the classification of the hours, Ayoub received the full payment (and even more) and therefore is not entitled to the differences in respect of overtime work and weekly rest, and the claim should be dismissed.
Convalescence Pay
- As stated above, we have determined that the plaintiff's version, according to which the entry in the pay slips reflects only the multiplication of the hours he worked with the hourly wage claimed by him, is incorrect, and therefore his argument that the payment on the pay slips for convalescence pay should not be taken into account is liable to be rejected. However, contrary to the defendant's claim, there are differences in payment, and we will elaborate.
- For the period from 8/2021 to 5/2022 (inclusive), the plaintiff was entitled to 5.83 convalescence days (= 10/12 months * 7 days) * ILS 423 per day = ILS 2,467. In practice, he was paid ILS 2,298 in the pay slips for the aforementioned period. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to a difference of ILS 170.
Redemption of annual leave
- The plaintiff petitions for payment of vacation redemption, claiming that during the period of employment he did not take paid leave and even at the end of employment he was not paid vacation, based on the following calculation - 12 days * 8 hours * 37 ILS = 3,552 ILS.
- On the other hand, the defendant claims that it paid him the sum of ILS 2,330 in this component during the period of employment and therefore there was no balance left to pay.
- Since the plaintiff worked for 10 months, his entitlement must be calculated according to section 3(c) of the Annual Leave Law, taking into account his seniority and the actual number of days worked. Therefore, the number of vacation days for which the plaintiff is entitled to redemption must be calculated as follows:
For the months of 8/2021 - 30.12.2021, in which the plaintiff actually worked for 131 days, he is entitled to a redemption of 131/240 * 14 vacation days = 7.64 vacation days, and after deducting partial days - 7 vacation days.