Interim Conclusion: The presumption that Prof. Seroussi used the plaintiffs' third trade secret was not contradicted and its theft and use were based on
- The PlaintiffT They presented a solid evidentiary basis that justified the establishment of the presumption of use in relation to the third trade secret - the structure of the chip.
The burden of proof therefore shifted to the defendants. These, for their part, did not present a real infrastructure in relation to the open efforts of their invention. Their version was found to be unreasonable. In these circumstances, the totality of the evidence before me supports the expert's conclusion that the defendants stole the third secret and used it as part of their patent applications.
- As things stand, the theft of the trade secret and its use have been established. Therefore, I am exempt from examining the question of whether these secrets were violated in a series of media publications in which the defendants published the invention they developed.
Didn't establish theft of the second secret - a breathing apparatus andthe integration of the chip in it
- The second secret addressed by the expert on behalf of the court is the integration of the chip into the respirator. An examination of the evidentiary totality at hand leads to the conclusion that the theft of the said secret has not been established.
- In the course of his cross-examination, the expert, in fairness, testified that there was no uniqueness among the plaintiffs, except for one characteristic: the attenuation of velocity in order to enable the absorption of all the virus particles into the chip. He testified as follows (459, S. 12-1).
So what is the difference, so why is there any difference if there is any difference between Eyal Mr. Ram's inhaler and Professor Prof. Seroussi, actually what is the difference? ... No, it's a rhetorical question and now the answer. The answer is that they have learned and it takes a long time, I have been dealing with it for about 3-4 years of my life. They were able to lower the speed in a short time, not 3-4 years of their lives, to lower the speed of the flow of the vanity here in the situation I have already mentioned, liquid and different, they were able to lower the flow to the minar speed so that there would be no impinging and there would be a very close to 100 percent layering of the vanity that includes the cytocanin and the cytocanin hypothesis and the viruses that Prof. Seroussi talks about in his patent on the surface.