Caselaw

Civil Appeal 8611/06 Bank Hapoalim Ltd. v. Michal Martin - part 10

March 2, 2011
Print

Conclusion

  1. I will suggest to my colleagues that the appeal be accepted in a manner Partial and to determine that the bank will be entitled to realize the mortgage that is the subject of the appeal in order to the amount of the debt it transferred to Union Bank, according to its shekel value at the time of the transfer of the funds (as stated in paragraph 48 above). Since the appeal was only partially accepted, no order for costs will be made.

Judge

Vice President E.  Rivlin:

I agree.

Vice-President

Judge A.  Arbel:

I agree.

Judge

It was decided, as stated, in the judgment of Judge M.  Naor.

Given today, 26 Adar 1, a civil appeal (March 2, 2011).

 

Vice-President Judge Judge

 

Previous part1...910