When you hear the amount of the sum, On the sum of 300,000 ₪ (The amount of the debt and the damage allegedly caused to the informants) The defendant testified as follows:; "I felt shivers all over my body, fear of these two people who were there, I didn't understand at first what they were talking about, where they got it from".
- As emerges from the testimony of the defendant, During the dubbing exercise, the defendant's uncle arrived at the scene, This is after both of them (Kerry- The Defendant and the Uncle) Schedule that the uncle will pick him up to get his hair cut. At that given moment, After the uncle arrived in accordance with the agreement with the defendant, The defendant arranged with the informants to meet with them again after he finished cutting his hair, and even gave them his location. And this is what he testified: "At that moment, I didn't really know how to get them off me and get out of this situation, I thought if my uncle suddenly got out of the car and told them to stay away from him, maybe they would hit him or the situation would be worse" (pp' 485 For the record, Lines 10 - 14).
- Up Next, After the uncle led the defendant to tell, Later, The defendant met with the informants, who reused the word "Mistake", When the defendant stated, Because the act (The reference to the murder incident that is the subject of the proceedings here) Made with a knife. According to the defendant, As expressed in his testimony in court, He knew it was a knife since his words came about a month and a half after the incident, So more than enough time has passed since the murder, This allowed him to be exposed to articles in newspapers and"All of Afula also knew about it" (pp' 485 For the record, Lines 22 -26). On the same page, Row 24, In response to a question addressed to him by the defense attorney - How did he know that it was an act committed using a knife?, Reply, "Because it was a month and a half later, I saw articles in the newspapers and all of Afula also knew about it". Later in the dubbing process, The defendant's message to the informants, Because it is a matter of -"Mistaken identification" (pp' 486 For the record, Row 4). And this is how the defendant explained his words to the informants:
"A: Because he told me like I didn't see how many options I had, I have a total if it's a mistake then good so I'll try to help you and I won't have to pay the- 300 A thousand but if it was intentional then I am in trouble. And do I have to pay ... And I thought about my family first".