When the witness learned of the alleged sale to the defendant, the witness sought Dvir Amar in order to clarify the matter, but to no avail. Either way, in 2015 negotiations were still underway with the defendant on the possibility of selling and buying the plot in which he was interested, and suddenly, in 2019, the same agreement that was (allegedly) made with Dvir Amar for the purchase of the plot by the defendant in 2011 appeared.
It should be noted here that Adv. Shai Yativ, who was summoned to testify by the defense (January 23, 2025, p. 4702, para. 18 ff.), confirmed that he had signed a power of attorney for the heirs that was given to Dvir Amar, but that Dvir Amar was supposed to receive the heirs' approval for every transaction he made in the land (p. 4711). Dvir Amar himself, who was also summoned to testify by the defense, testified (1 October 2024, p. 4408, paras. 3 onwards): "They actually gave me a power of attorney to do any action in the property, any action that would be required, whether it was to settle the debts, whether it was a sale, etc." However, Adv. Yativ clarified that Dvir Amar was obligated to update the heirs, and that any action was supposed to be done "in joint agreement with the owners/heirs," according to the agreement between them. Dvir Amar claimed that the agreement was made in the presence of Dalia Mandel at the office of attorney Shai Yativ, while the latter claimed that due to medical limitations he signed Dalia Mandel at her home, and only afterwards did they go to his office to complete the signatures.
The agreement between the defendant and Dvir Amar (P/35) was ostensibly signed in the office of attorney Ron Barnett, but for some reason the latter was not summoned to testify.
The witness Moshe Einhorn went on to say that the defendant used to come to his place of work accompanied by his wife (who was very active in the meetings), and to try to persuade him to accept his positions regarding the dispute over the property. On one occasion (on 15 June 2020), the defendant came alone, raised his voice in a threatening tone, banged a bookcase and knocked it down and what was on it. As a result, a complaint was filed with the police (see also: Action Report P/390), but later it was announced that the file had been shelved (P/22). The witness confirmed, in response to the defendant's counsel's question, that he was sure that the defendant had murdered the deceased. In his words, "S. [...] You assume that the murder of the late attorney Arnon stemmed from the transactions that were carried out in your property, right? A. Yes. Q. I mean, as far as David is concerned, he committed the murder [...] You tell me it black and white, okay. A. Correct" (23 November 2023, p. 3193 from s. 30 to p. 3194, s. 3). The witness also said that he lived in fear after the murder.