Caselaw

Arbitration Claims (Tel Aviv) 58922-01-17 Uri Itzhaki v. Netanya Sports and Basketball Promotion Company Ltd. - part 10

March 23, 2018
Print

Conclusion

  1. We reject the request to set aside an arbitral award.
  2. When the request to annul the arbitration award was rejected, We Confirm the Arbitration Award, By virtue of the provisions Section 28 Law The Arbitration.
  3. With regard to the request to amend the minutes of the hearing of the 27.11.17, Served on 18.12.17, and fromthat the applicant did not respond, We agree to the amendment as requested. The corrections requested by the respondent are a clerical error or an accidental omission, And in any case, They don't change Substantially from the minutes.
  4. The applicant will bear the expenses of theRespondent in the sum of 15,000 ₪ in 30 A day from today, If not, Bear This amount is linkage and interest differentials asLaw From today until the actual date of payment.

Given today, 7 Nissan 5778, (March 23, 2018), in the absence of the parties and will be sent to them. 

 

 

     

 

P.Z.  (Employers)

Meir Bar-El

  Sarah Meiri, Judge -

Presiding Judge

  P.Z.  (Employees)

Jonathan Dekel

 

 

N.Z.  signed on March 22, 2018.

Corrections: Sharon Koplewitz + Inbar

Sarah Meiri

 

Previous part1...910