Caselaw

Labor Dispute (Tel Aviv) 28207-09-21 IT. Rehabilitation Ltd. – Avraham Matzliah - part 14

August 24, 2025
Print

"Adv. Brotfeld: You don't know.  Look, I want to refer you to Appendix 33 to Tsafrir's affidavit.  I'm showing you, you're sending an email to Yaakov, first of all, it's Yaakov Moss, I understand, right?

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: Yes.

Adv. Brotfeld: Nice.  I see that you are writing, you should pay attention to the commissions of Moshe and ours, now, in the email already, I ask you, if it is voluntary, how can it be that the commissions are ours, yours and his? After all, if what you say was true, then you should have written down Moshe's commissions and yours, not ours.

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: This is an unsuccessful formulation no more than that.

Adv. Brotfeld: Unsuccessful wording.  Now, unsuccessful wording, I refer you to the last page of this appendix, there is a table here that you detailed to Yaakov how the transaction and everyone's commissions will be divided.  And I refer you to the headline before the end, it says Jacob's commission plus my father in dollars, it says $165,500 commission Jacob plus my father,

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: Yes.

Adv. Brothfeld: Now I'm asking, when you write that $166,500 is a commission, it says Yaakov's commission plus my father, is it also a mistake that it says Yaakov's commission plus my father?

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: Yes.

Adv. Brotfeld: Is that a mistake?

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: Yes.

The Honorable Judge Tzadik: So why is it written "commission for my father"?

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: Because I made a mistake, I made a mistake in the wording, it was a wording error, there was no intention.

The Honorable Judge Tzadik: It's really taking a name,

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: That's my name, and I made a mistake in the wording, we didn't get it, this deal wasn't done anyway, it didn't come to fruition.

The Honorable Judge Tzadik: But if this deal had been made and you had received it, it would have gone to my father plus Yaakov, or to whom? Where is the mistake?

The witness, Mr. Matzliah: It was supposed to be Yaakov plus Iris, but I was wrong, there wasn't, there was no intention there to receive a commission."

Previous part1...1314
15...35Next part