3 Apps + 2 New Converters (Which Converters?)
Price includes full Charlton including to go when the first 2 months Charlton is free.
Fixed Free Internet Range Extender
VOD is open on a regular basis, not including content that is normally paid for with you.
Unlimited Moby Time Channel
50 NISVOD Credit
All channels are open including premium including sports 5live
Router included
In my house, everything is an internet line for the TV, no hot antenna connection, old FYI
Installation Included
If you approve, you can coordinate installation
[Plaintiff]: All this for 49 ILS the first month
131 ILS Second Month
And after that, 270 ILS unlimited
[Coral Harush]: Happy, but one thing:
Charlton is a free month rather than two months.
of your choice."
Later, an attempt was made by the plaintiff to insist on receiving two months of free Charlton, who was unsuccessful, and Coral ended with text messages (14:41-14:43):
"[Coral Harush]: I don't have an option. We pampered you with a package at an amazing price compared to what you got.
Free month at Charlton only.
I have no way of touching it beyond a month for free. It's external.
[Coral Harush]: What did you decide?
[Coral Harush]: A lot of people would love to get a free month Charlton.
[Coral Harush]: And you got it."
The next text message, the next day, testifies, according to its contents, that consent was approved and that there was a regulation.
- In the statement of claim, the plaintiff says that some of the promises were kept late (two of the channel packages were opened after a week), and some were not fulfilled at all (no sports package was provided). to go, i.e., for the mobile phone, and not for the Moby Time channel), and yes, because there were overcharges: in fact, starting from the first invoice, the billing amounts were higher than agreed upon (in December 2024 at ILS 32, and in March 2025 at ILS 162, and the rest of the amounts between these two extremes, with the total excess charge reaching ILS 467 (as of the date the claim was filed, and including a charge of ILS 120 for the installation, even though the consent text message explicitly states that the price includes the installation).
- Here it should be emphasized that the statement of claim also includes a relief that this court is not authorized to grant, in the form of enforcement of the agreement (as detailed at the end of the statement of claim). This relief deviates from the remedies under the jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court, of course, and therefore I will ignore it, and will only apply to the monetary remedies that were claimed, as detailed.
The Ottoman Settlement [Old Version] 19166. In fact, there is no dispute that the charges appearing in the invoices do not correspond to the details of the consents in the text messages as they are written., at least for the purpose of using the Service vod, which was supposed to be free of charge, but was billed on invoices. The defendants' position is not that there is no discrepancy, but rather is based on the fact that she sent a summary of the agreements by email, and these specify terms that are different from those in the text message, and that constitute the basis for the charges that were actually made, so that according to these conditions there is no overcharge at all. This agreement, according to the defendants, which is later than the text messages, reflects the actual agreements, especially in view of the absence of any reservation on the part of the plaintiff.