In light of the above, We were convinced that the last car purchased by the company, Similar to the other vehicles that were made available for the plaintiff's use during his work for the plaintiff, It was a company car and not a personal car of the plaintiff.
- Conclusion -
(1) The Claim Against the Defendant Tax' 2 Rejected.
(2) The claim against the defendant Tax' 1 is partially received and the defendant is taxed' 1 to pay the plaintiff for advance notice in the amount of 66,000 ₪, Together with linkage and interest differentials from the date of 1.4.11 and up to the date of the actual payment;
(3) Since the amount of the claim was set at 3,862,714 ₪, However, the claim was accepted at a relatively small rate compared to the original amount of the claim, Taking into account that there was no room for a lawsuit against Levy, and in view of the number of witnesses and meetings in this case, The plaintiff will bear the defendant's expenses tax' 1 In total 5,000 ₪, Tax on the defendant's expenses' 2 In total 5,000 ₪ (This sum was determined in view of the fact that Levy's testimony was required, Even ignoring the personal lawsuit against him), and also in the expenses of the"9:77"D. The defendants in the sum of 15,000 ILS that if they are not paid within 30 Days, will bear linkage and interest differentials in accordance with the law until the actual payment is made..
Given today, 2 Tammuz 5774, (June 30, 2014), in the absence of the parties.
| Yitzhak Glick, Public Representative, (Employers) | Dagit Weissman, Judge |