Or cheap pure honey.
This is the number [phone] of Shikma Bressler [plaintiff 1].
Call, send messages
Enjoy and distribute among the ultra-Orthodox
They Love Terry (Laughter to Tears Emoji)
-XXXXXXX054 [the plaintiff's mobile phone number]."
As of the time it was presented to this court, the tweet has received nearly 9,000 views, 70 retweets and 369 "like" marks. Half an hour later, the defendant posted another tweet on her "X" account (over 4,000 views; 44 retweets and 212 "likes"):
"Cheap baby products:
Diapers, wipes, etc.
Ami Dror [Plaintiff 4]: XXXXXXX-054 [Plaintiff 4's mobile phone number]
Moshe Redman [Plaintiff 3]: XXXXXXX-054 [Plaintiff 3's mobile phone number]
While stocks last."
Two more hours passed and a third publication came, on the same platform (over 1,200 views, 19 retweets and 101 "likes"). The defendant wrote:
"Oren Shvil [Plaintiff 2]: XXXXXXX-054 [Plaintiff 2's mobile phone number]
From Brothers to Arms
Providing security services, call center services, concerts, tire burning and cleaning services
and maintenance for thousands of businesses and private homes from Dan to Eilat.
Great prices!".
- "The defendant posted my phone number", plaintiff No. 1 testified in the group here, "[it was] Call to Call. Shortly afterwards, my phone was flooded with calls and messages. I received dozens of calls on Friday night. The whole essence of this [publication] is to give my personal details, so that [the defendant's] supporters and followers will open the 'gates of hell' for me, which indeed happened. [e] Publicity harassed me, and I received many phone calls from unidentified or unknown numbers. I found myself inundated with incoming calls and mocking messages [including:] 'Are there cheap eggs? We have a lot of children[,] we need at least 10 templates"; "Is it possible to order eggs for Mea She'arim?!"; "I understand that you sell free-range eggs? What's the price for the mold?" (Transcript, at p. 59, s. 2; p. 60, s. 11-13; p. 64, s. 5-8; paragraphs 11 and 15 of the plaintiff's main testimony affidavit).
Plaintiff No. 2, Mr. Shabil, stated in his testimony that he was not connected in any way and had nothing to do with the "provision of security and call center services" or the field of security in general. "There is no connection" (Transcript, at p. 22, paras. 11-19). "The publication led to dozens of conversations," he testified, "it calls on people to harass me, and it did succeed for that lady [the defendant], who received a variety of harassments" (ibid., at p. 26, paras. 4-5 and 17-18).