A: I don't remember.
Q: You don't remember. But you're saying there were conversations?
A: I don't remember. Most of the communication between us was after the signing of the contract.
Q: I get it.
A: I don't remember the media before.
Q: In other words, all the negotiations that preceded the signing of the contract were not at all with Shalva Jinli?
A: Most of the communication that was with Yoav Hasson was about potential customers, potential license customers, approval. And his job was to negotiate out of my interests, from the...
The Honorable Judge Anisman: In my name, he said, On my behalf , in my name.
Adv. Grady: On my behalf,
The witness, Mr. A. Hadad: On my behalf, yes."
- In his testimony, Mr. Haddad reiterated the extent of Mr. Hasson's significant involvement in the negotiation stage, as the plaintiffs' representative, to the extent that the party communicating with the plaintiffs at the end of the negotiations does not even know about the existence of the relationship between them and Mr. Hasson, because the agency agreement is not attached to the agreement that was signed at the end of the day. According to him, the representation presented to the party communicating with the plaintiffs is such that Mr. Hasson negotiates and gives in the framework of the negotiations on behalf of the plaintiffs (transcript of November 10, 2025, p. 35, s. 18 - p. 37, s. 1):
Q: So Yoav Hasson was your representative?
A: The agreement with him was that his job was to introduce us to potential companies for approval, and to connect us in terms of language.
Q: In other words, the Agency's agreement... Now, the agency agreement wasn't included in the contracts between you and the clients, right?
A: When you say no attached, what do you mean?
Q: That the person calling doesn't know about the relationship between you and Yoav Hasson. He knows that Yoav Hasson came on behalf of the plaintiffs, in the name of lifestyle.
A: Yes, it is part of the representation agreement.