0 On the face of it, it may seem that this consideration is very similar to the previous consideration that I discussed, since both deal with, in a certain sense, the question of the station's preoccupation with politics and current affairs. However, this is not the case. In fact, There is a wide chasm between these two considerations: The consideration that seeks to disconnect between the Army Radio station and dealing with current affairs altogether, and the tendency of the broadcasts regarding issues of political dispute, whatever may be, in order to preserve the army's stateliness, is a practical and strictly valid reason. On the other hand, the consideration I discussed above, which seeks to close the station due to the dissatisfaction of those in power with the fact that the tendency of the broadcasters, in their opinion, is inconsistent with their position on politically disputed issues, is an improper consideration of all impropriety, as explained above.
It should be emphasized: Given that we are dealing with the cause of extraneous considerations, we are not dealing with the operative content of the decision, but with the reason underlying it. Thus, a decision to close the station altogether may well be a valid and valid decision, provided that it is based on practical reasons; And without setting any precedents on the matter, I am of the opinion that a decision based on the reasoning of statehood that I discussed above may be such a decision. On the other hand, even a much smaller decision, such as closing the station's current affairs department, causing the dismissal of a broadcaster particularand even enforcing the transfer of a certain program to a broadcast date when the audience is smaller - is an improper decision, insofar as it is made on the basis of a consideration concerning the content of that broadcast, and their suitability, or incompatibility, with the positions of the party (or coalition of parties) that is in power at the time.