A: I told you.
Q: What time was the windshield broken?
A: I don't know.
Q: Five minutes earlier, approximately?
A: I don't know about ... I told you it was a car accident. I was in a hurry, I had to bring things home, we had an accident.
Q: What speed did you drive?
A: I don't remember.
Q: Roughly what speed did you drive?
A: I don't have anything to explain to you in the previous interrogation" (p. 4).
Even in his fourth and "concluding" interrogation of October 16,2023 (P/27(a)) the defendant refrained from answering many questions, including critical questions that were known to clarify his manner of driving, things he did or noticed:
"Q: According to the page you see, which direction did you come from...?
A: I don't remember anything.
Q: How come you don't remember what happened before the car-ramming, only a few weeks passed?
A: I don't remember and I don't move it, I told you exactly what happened. What do I have with him that I'm going to do to him like that, he jumped in my face.
Q: Do you know where the buffer is on the road?
A: No.
Q: How come you don't know, it's in your neighborhood?
A: I don't know.
Q: Where was the injury to Muhammad? Mark on the drawing.
A: I don't remember, I told you" (p. 4).
If that were not enough, when the interrogator showed the defendant the reenactment videos made by the traffic examiners in order to get his attention, it is noted that the defendant refuses to refer to what appears in the videos: "I don't want to see anything." The interrogator's note even details that the defendant takes his eyes off the screen in order to avoid watching the videos that are shown to him.
Against the background of the claim of repeated forgetfulness in the interrogations, one must wonder how the defendant's memory improved and sharpened when he came to testify in his defense a year and nine months after the incident, testimony in which he was able to well describe his route before and after the car-ramming, including a demonstration using an object that simulated his car on a drawing.