In response to this question, I will begin by noting that there is no dispute that unrealized building rights have a monetary value. In support of these arguments, the defendants referred to the judgment Other Municipal Applications 19/81 Binyamin Bibi v. Dr. Carl Horbert, 37(2) 497, as well as to Civil Appeal 6900/14 Dan Levitt v. Hannah Benvenisti (September 28,2016), where it was held that excess building rights have value. However, in the present case, the question is not whether the rights have value, but rather what value they have. An answer to this question - i.e., in the framework of which an absolute value is determined in the amount or as a coefficient - was not given in case law. Instead, it can be learned from the case law that the question of what value will be given to the building rights depends on various variables, including - since in fact it is a right granted in the framework of a building permit - the chance of granting the building rights in practice (see Civil Appeal 36/11 Israel Postal Company Ltd. v. Hefzibah Housing and Development Ltd. (September 3,2015) at paragraphs 42-44). In the case at hand, the court's expert noted that while a coefficient of 0.44 could be a reasonable coefficient, in his approach - which in my opinion is consistent with the case law - there is no room to relate to the coefficient categorically, but rather that it should be examined in accordance with the concrete circumstances. This was detailed in his opinion, the main points of which were detailed above, and in addition, in his testimony in the framework of his cross-examination, in which he testified on page 27, line 31 to page 28, line 2:
"Witness Mr. West: So I'll answer, the first question I answered is that the factual basis of the territories is different, again, I have an agreement and I have an examination of mine, I don't know how to intervene, I don't, I mentioned it as a fact. Regarding the second component of the additional relative part, I noted that the coefficient of 44 is reasonable in my opinion if it were detached from all contexts, when it is not detached from all contexts so in my opinion it is even on the high side, if I had thought, I would have to correct it even down."