ביום 11.7.2013 נחתם הסכם קיבוצי כללי בין ארגון חברות הניקיון לבין הסתדרות העובדים הכללית החדשה. הוראותיו של הסכם קיבוצי זה הורחבו ביום 5.2.2014 על כלל המעבידים המספקים שירותי ניקיון ו/או תחזוקה ועל עובדים המועסקים על ידי חברות אלה בעבודת ניקיון ו/או תחזוקה. יש לשים לב, כי בהתאם לצו ההרחבה, החל מיום 1.7.2015 הפרשות מעסיק לתגמולים יהיו 7.5% (חלק עובד 7%) ו-8.33% לפיצויי פיטורים.
Related articles
“Football is played from Saturday to Saturday” and players’ salary includes weekly rest indemnity and the off-season is considered vacation utilization
Sports Law
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
Two Israeli Premier League football players demanded from their teams, after their employment ended, payment for weekly rest indemnity on Saturdays, and redemption of vacation days. The Labor Court held that the clubs do not need to pay for weekly rest indemnity and vacation redemption. Generally, the Israeli Wage Protection Law prohibits a salary that […]
The Hours of Work and Rest Law will not apply when it is not possible to separate the working hours from the employee’s private time
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
Workers on the farm lived there with their families and worked day and night at varying hours according to the needs of the farm. The Labor Court held that the Hours of Work and Rest Law does not apply to the employment the workers due to employer’s inability to supervise. The Israeli Hours of Work […]
When ESOP are subject to terms to be agreed one cannot invalidate an employment agreement because of disappointment of the offered option terms
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
High-Tech and Technology
Labor Law
A startup company employed a scientist. The employment agreement stipulated that intellectual property belonged to the company and that the issue of employee stock options would be settled later. After 8 months, a dispute arose regarding the option terms (the company’s requirement for a vesting period and actual work), the scientist decided to go on […]
Personal responsibility cannot be played on a CEO through piercing of the corporate veil if he is not an actual shareholder.
Labor Law
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
The widow of a company employee sought to sue the company and its CEO, who she contended to be a hidden controlling shareholder, after pension contributions were not made for the employee during his employment period. The Court held that the corporate veil cannot be pierced and that personal liability should not be imposed on […]