A Honduran citizen filed a lawsuit to cancel the sale of a real estate property he owns, his only asset in Israel, on which an additional cautionary note was recorded in favor of a third party. The Court granted the motion of the defendants htat the plaintiff deposit a guarantee to secure their costs. Under Israeli law, a Court may order a plaintiff to provide a guarantee for the defendant's costs. Still, it will only do so in exceptional circumstances, such as when the plaintiff is a foreign resident with no assets in Israel from which costs could be easily collected if the claim is dismissed. The purpose of the guarantee is to prevent a situation in which a winning defendant cannot recover their costs. Here, the plaintiff is a foreign resident and the property in question is his only asset in the country. Moreover, the recording of an additional cautionary note on the property in favor of a third party creates a substantial encumbrance on the future ability to collect from the asset. Accordingly, the plaintiff was ordered to deposit ILS 150,000 to secure the defendants' costs.
Published in Afik News 450 15.10.2025
Related articles
Board of Directors’ resolutions adopted in the absence of a quorum, which did not receive ex post facto support from the quorum, are void ab initio
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A company filed a lawsuit by virtue of a resolution adopted at a board meeting held in the absence of a legal quorum, and without obtaining the consent of the absent director to said resolution. The Court summarily dismissed the claim due to the board resolution’s nullity. In contrast to resolutions adopted at board meetings […]
The termination of a contract due to the failure of a condition precedent does not extinguish all of its obligations
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
Following entry of a company into insolvency proceedings, a transaction counterparty announced the termination of the agreement due to the non-fulfillment of a condition precedent and began dealing directly with a foreign manufacturer despite contract terms stipulating non-compete. The Court held that the contract expired but the non-compete provision is valid. A condition precedent is […]
A company’s monetary debt does not, in itself, justify piercing the corporate veil or attributing the company’s debt to the shareholder personally
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A radio station operator demanded that a shareholder of an advertising company personally bear the debt accumulated by the company for advertising services provided to it. The Court rejected the claim against the shareholder and held that the extreme conditions justifying the piercing of the corporate veil were not proven. Piercing the corporate veil is […]
Concealing pregnancy during a hearing and revealing it only subsequently negates compensation for dismissal during pregnancy
Labor Law
Dispute Resolution
An employee demanded compensation from the employer who dismissed her while she was pregnant. The employer dismissed her for professional reasons and economic difficulties during the war period. The employee revealed to the employer that she is pregnant only a day after the hearing and did not present proof thereof. The Labor Court found that […]