Published in Afik news 055 05.08.2010
Related articles
Favoring associates in the provision of services does not constitute prohibited discrimination under law
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
An individual evacuated from his home following the outbreak of the “Swords of Iron” war and accommodated in a hotel was demanded to move to another hotel, for reasons of required renovations while a group of evacuees associated with a hotel employee was allowed to stay. The Supreme Court rejected the contention of illegal discrimination. […]
The termination of a contract due to the failure of a condition precedent does not extinguish all of its obligations
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
Following entry of a company into insolvency proceedings, a transaction counterparty announced the termination of the agreement due to the non-fulfillment of a condition precedent and began dealing directly with a foreign manufacturer despite contract terms stipulating non-compete. The Court held that the contract expired but the non-compete provision is valid. A condition precedent is […]
A fixed term agreement that is continued through conduct creates a new contractual framework that is not limited in time
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A manufacturer and a franchisee signed a franchise agreement for 5 years with an option to extend it for 5 additional years. Following the end of the original term, the parties continued their working relationship without signing a new agreement. After the manufacturer unilaterally terminated the agreement only 3 years later, the franchisee demanded compensation […]
Initial ownership belongs to the creator who designed the work, not the technical executor, unless otherwise agreed
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
A malfunction in a drone belonging to a press photographer, who had arrived to cover the clock repair at the Jaffa Clock Tower, forced him to seek the assistance of a repair company employee to execute the shot. Consequently, the company and the employee sought recognition as the copyright holders of the photograph. The Court […]