Published in Afik news 055 05.08.2010
Related articles
The existence of defamation is determined by the message conveyed to the viewer, not by the publisher’s intent
Privacy, GDPR, Confidentiality and protection of reputation
Intellectual Property, Copyrights, Trademarks, Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
Following a radio interview on channel 103, in which Yossi Langotsky, the father of the deep-water gas field discoveries in the Mediterranean Sea, warned against deteriorating into civil war amidst the public debate, Channel 14 personality Yaakov Bardugo delivered a monologue that same evening accusing Langotsky of threatening violence, calling for his arrest, and referring […]
A Claim That a Contract Clause is Merely a Sham Requires a High Standard of Proof
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
An agreement for the provision of furniture transport and assembly services existed between two companies, which either party was entitled to terminate with 60 days’ notice. After several years, the transport company requested to replace the agreement with an engagement with a sister company but because the sister company required this in order to finance […]
Ownership of funds deposited into a bank account prior to adding a partner is determined by the intent behind the addition, rather than the act itself
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Domestic Relations
Notarial wills and testaments
A son was joined as a partner tohis parent’s bank account. And after their demise contended ownership of the funds in the account. The Court held that adding the son to the account was done solely for convenience and without the intention of granting him the funds as a gift. The Israeli Gift Law and […]
A non-compete clause does not automatically become void upon termination of the contract but will be evaluated in light of the circumstances
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A store chain owner suspected that one of the franchisees secretly became a shareholder in a competing store chain using his brother as a “straw man”. Following these suspicions, the chain terminated the franchise agreements for two branches and for the third branch demanded to activate a “forced separation” mechanism due to “breach of trust.” […]