Published in Afik News 066 05.01.2011
Related articles
The duty of good faith requires grant of extension in a material breach of contract where the terminating party’s breach led to the counter-breach
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
After an agreement for the sale of a residential home was signed and the late provision of Form 4 (Occupancy Permit) by the seller, the purchasers failed to timely pay the balance of the consideration. Shortly thereafter, the seller sent an immediate notice of termination based on a material breach of contract. The Supreme Court […]
Even a ‘finder’ type middleman is required to prove being the efficient factor of the transaction to be entitled to a commission
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
Commercial, Banking and Financial
A company entered into a finder’s fee agreement with a middleman, under which it committed to pay him a commission in exchange for establishing a connection between the company and an investor who would invest in it or its affiliates. Approximately seven years after the contact initiated by the middleman between the company and a […]
Pre-contractual representations may obligate despite a contractual clause annulling their validity
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Real estate in Israel and around the world
Dispute Resolution
An individual purchased plots of land after being exposed to television advertisements and representations made during meetings with the sellers, according to which the plots were being sold at a discounted price and were ready for construction. Following the purchase, the buyer discovered that the reality was far from the advertisements and sought to cancel […]
Favoring associates in the provision of services does not constitute prohibited discrimination under law
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
An individual evacuated from his home following the outbreak of the “Swords of Iron” war and accommodated in a hotel was demanded to move to another hotel, for reasons of required renovations while a group of evacuees associated with a hotel employee was allowed to stay. The Supreme Court rejected the contention of illegal discrimination. […]