Published in Afik News 172 18.02.2015
Related articles
A framework relationship contract is a general agreement that is open to changes and updates in matters that the parties to the contract have chosen not to settle in advance
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Holders of rights of residential units in a luxury hotel demanded the hotel owners to appoint an internationally renowned management company to manage the hotel as well as refrain from raising the management fees. The Supreme Court held that the agreement is a closed agreement and there is no reason to obligate or prevent the […]
The publisher of a fictional work featuring a character with identifiable characteristics of a real person may face legal action
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
An author published a fictional book centered on a villainous, criminal, and deceitful character. The character in the book was portrayed as an Israeli, a lecturer in intelligence at Sofia University, involved in real estate in Bulgaria, who had undergone bariatric surgery and suffered from diabetes – details matching precisely a businessman who was previously […]
In the absence of other concent the copyright in the commissioned work will remain in the hands of the creator
Copyright, Trademarks Media and Artists
Dispute Resolution
A printing house made it possible for its customers to upload photos, with T-shirts printed by it, onto its website. Among the photos uploaded by the customers were pictures of T-shirts on which works made to order by an artist were printed for the purpose of printing them on T-shirts, but without the artist giving […]
Even if business logic justifies exclusivity of a contract this by itself is sufficient to create an exclusive agreement
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
A distributor contended that a manufacture interfered with a contract between itself and a third party for the exclusively distribution of its products, including products manufactured together with the distributor. The Court held that the manufacturer did not commit tortious interference of the contract with the third party. The prima facia tort of tortious interference […]