Published in Afik News 170 21.01.2015
Related articles
Tender bids submitted by the same party raise suspicions of improper coordination between bidders and may be disqualified
Public Law, Environment and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
The tender committee of the Israel Land Authority disqualified three bids after they were placed in the tender box together by the same person. The Court rejected the petition of the disqualified bidders and held that the tender committee’s decision to disqualify the bidders due to apprehension of improper coordination should not be intervened with. […]
The mere possibility to correct a materiel defect in a bid submitted in a competitive procedure may harm the principle of equality
Public Law, Environment and Tenders
Dispute Resolution
A bidder’s bid in a competitive procedure for the selection of a transportation operator was disqualified due to errors in the price bid. The Court rejected the petition and held that the bid was duly disqualified due to a fundamental defect in the bid that cannot be corrected. A public authority’s competitive procedure is subject […]
In order to obligate a shareholder in debts of a collapsed company requires the authority to show that the company had assets
Taxation and Government Incentives and Funding
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Common-Law Marriages Agreements
A company was closed when it had city tax debts. The authority demanded that the controlling shareholder of the company pay the debt on the grounds that assets of the company were transferred to him. The Court held that a control holder cannot be obligated to pay the city tax debt without first showing that […]
Reasonableness of a delay in contract termination following prior notice will be examined under the circumstances
Public Law, Environment and Tenders
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
The winner of a tender to execute a complex project did not meet its tender obligations, and nearly three months after the last day it was given to cure the breach had passed, the tenderer terminated the agreement between the parties due to the tender winner’s non-compliance with its contractual obligations. The Supreme Court rejected […]