Published in Afik News 079 06.07.2011
Related articles
A partner who terminates a partnership agreement in bad faith may be obligated to pay compensation for loss of entrepreneurial profit
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A farm owner terminated a partnership agreement with a company engaged in the marketing and construction of solar systems in favor of an engagement with a competing company, contending that he was entitled to terminate the partnership agreement at any time. The Court partially accepted the claim and the farm owner is to pay compensation […]
A company may avoid holding an annual meeting and appoint an auditor for a period not exceeding 3 years
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Dispute Resolution
A shareholder sought to appoint for the company an independent auditor contending that the company’s existing auditor is in a conflict of interest because he is authorized to report in several companies of one of the shareholders and also that his appointment was flawed. The Court held that the auditor of the company was duly […]
A global corporation with activity in Israel is expected in the event of a dispute to litigate in Israel even if a jurisdiction and foreign law clause exists
High-Tech and Technology
International Transactions and Disputes and Israeli “Soft Landing”
Dispute Resolution
Israeli customers filed in Israel a motion for a class action against the LinkedIn company, contending that it automatically renews paid subscriptions in violation of the Israeli Consumer Protection Law, despite the fact that under the LinkedIn terms of use in the event of a dispute, laws of the state of California, U.S.A, shall exclusively […]
When shares have not been allocated, the damage caused is the value of the shares at the time of the non-allocation, even if the company subsequently collapsed
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
Commercial, Banking and Financial
Dispute Resolution
Restaurant owners quarreled with the restaurant’s chef, and as a result, shares promised to him under a share allocation agreement in the company managing the activity were not allocated. The company collapsed, so the chef demanded the salary he would have received for his work if he had agreed to accept shares instead of salary. […]