An employee complaint at the police on sexual harassment on her and simultaneously filed a legal claim against the employer.
The Court held that repeated offers of a sexual nature that are directed to a person who showed that lack of interest in such offers are sexual harassment. However, in the existence of employer-employee relationship between the parties, and certainly where relationship of authority exists, the employee is not required to show lack of interest. The Court ordered payment of ILS 40,000 as compensation without proof of damage out of the ILS 120,000 that the law empowers the Court to order in such a claim without proof of damage.