Published in Afik News 133 21.08.2013
Related articles
The Court may approve an arrangement between a public company and warrant holders, subject to due publication and the absence of objections
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Dispute Resolution
A public company sought to reach an arrangement with warrant holders to extend their exercise period and petitioned for relief. The Court granted the motion and approved the arrangements reached by the public company with the warrant holders. Under the Israeli law, a company wishing to reach a compromise or arrangement, including with warrant holders, […]
Upon non-publication of financial statements at the expiration of the initial suspension period the company is transferred to the maintenance list
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Dispute Resolution
A public company which shares were suspended from trading on TASE due to non-publication of financial statements petitioned at the last minute against the transfer of its shares to the maintenance list after the three months of suspension had lapsed. The company sought a short delay contending that the statements would be published soon, but […]
In order to be a controlling shareholder in a company the shareholder must have a substantial ability to direct the company’s activities.
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Dispute Resolution
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
A shareholder in a public company sought to prevent the convening of a board committee established to evaluate offers to acquire the company and take it private, claiming that flaws occurred in the appointment of the directors to the committee due to their connection to a controlling shareholder in one of the bidding entities. The […]
Approval of CEO compensation via over-ruling requires addressing shareholders’ opposition
Capital Markets and Stock Exchange Regulations
Dispute Resolution
Business, Corporate and Joint Ventures
After the general assembly of shareholders in a public company rejected the decision of the compensation committee and the board of directors of the company to grant the CEO a special bonus that deviates from the company’s compensation policy, the bonus was approved via an “overruling” decision. The Court dismissed the company’s motion for summary […]