This version of the defendant was not sufficiently proven (it was not proven what the acceptable range was, and the parties' testimonies in this matter were not uniform), especially since in any case it is not relevant to the determination of the plaintiff's salary in our case.
As appears from the price quote relating to the Shazar Junction project, and as noted above, the plaintiff's wages were made according to the 'Netivei Israel Tariff', and this is what Mr. Fahoum explained in his testimony when he was asked about it ("Netivei Israel's price list, which is not related to the amount of the execution" (p. 11, paras. 21-23; and see also p. 6, s. 21 and p. 15, s. 13). Therefore, the discussion of the question of the estimate of the project's execution or the percentage rate that should be derived from this estimate is superfluous.
- As for other proceedings to which the plaintiff's counsel referred in his summaries in which the Nahariya Municipality reached settlement agreements with one or another service providers, they are not relevant to this proceeding before me, especially when we are dealing with compromises in which it is not possible to trace the circumstances under which the agreements were formulated as they were formed.
Conclusion
- I accept the claim in part and oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff the sum of ILS 150,000, together with linkage differences and interest as required by law from the date of filing the claim until the actual full payment.
I order the defendant to pay the plaintiff legal expenses and attorney's fees in the total amount of ILS 20,000.
The amounts awarded will be paid through counsel for the parties, within 30 days. If they are not paid on time, linkage differences and interest will be borne by law from today until the date of actual payment.
Given today, December 03, 2025, in the absence of the parties.