I will refer below to a review of a case law that can teach the Supreme Court case the punitive policy used for the offense of threats, as it appears from theAppeals Committee's clarification of the second indictment in the attached file, as follows:
Criminal Case (Shalom-Acre) 37810-05-24 State of Israel v. Naimi (18.05.2025) - The defendant ordereda wage under the authority of a registrar of the offense of threats, which was filed an appeal in a financial case - Supreme Court against a police officer, saying: "I know that there is no dispute in the collective dispute of declarative law - in general, you live, I will wine you". A punishment range was determined ranging from a conditional imprisonment to 12 months in the case of afinancial case - the upper and the imposition of a financial case - the defendant in a financial case - the supreme sentence of a suspended sentence for 3 months, along with the accompanying punishment components.
Criminal Case (Shalom-Beer Sheva) 4358-08-22 State of Israel v. Abu Zayed (16.11.2025) - The defendant orderedwages under the authority of the Registrar of 3 offenses of threats, an appeal was filed in a financial case - Supreme Court and a committee against police officers. A punishment range has been determined, ranging from a gag on publication tax, a month of imprisonment that can be served and run a do/injunction (permanent) do/injunction (permanent) and prevention (permanent) in community service and up to 20 months imprisonment in afinancial case – supreme and a monetary case – supreme in which the defendant is sentenced to 7 months imprisonment in community service, along with accompanying punitive components.
Criminal Case (Shalom-103) 26258-03-22 State of Israel v. Dadoun (12.12.2023) - The defendant orderedwages under the authority of the Registrar of Threats, which was filedan appeal in the case of Caspi - Supreme Court against a prison guard, saying: "I will drink you, come you slut enter a civil case and I will show you who I am.". It was determined that the punishment ranges from punishment of a collective dispute order Declaratory law - forward-looking rules and up to 12 months imprisonment in the case of a financial case - supreme and a financial case - supreme was imposed on the defendant 4 months in practice, hopa financial case - supreme Conditional imprisonment of 4 months cumulatively to the prison sentence, so that it was determined that the defendant will serve a do/injunction (permanent) do/injunction / injunction (permanent) prevention (permanent) demolition without conviction 8 months in practice, along with accompanying punitive components.