:A It's not true what you're saying, you've already asked me that. I did my own search, I found what I could. The Ministry of Health and the Central Bureau of Statistics, both showed me legitimate and valid sources, so I did initiate a search myself, and this was in addition to what I received from the lawyers.
:Q OK. I respect your presence here, but I don't understand how you did this search if you don't speak Hebrew. All your graceful librarians don't speak Hebrew. The doctors you told us were under the hem of your robe don't speak Hebrew, so what search did you do? Explain to me, I really want to know what search you did and how.
:A I've already answered you, for example, the Central Bureau of Statistics has a lot of websites that have a page in both Hebrew and English. I mean, I could understand what the material was in them, but you know the Hebrew itself, I couldn't get it out myself, so I asked for help. But I found the thing myself.
(In detail, pp. 2203-2210).
- Later on, and in this context, the expert testified and replied as follows:
Adv. A. Amorai: In short, all you're telling us is that. Oh. The data you based on is from. Oh. From Dr. Libiki's documents and papers, right?
The Witness, Dr. Julie G.: ...I have performed many surgeries in my report, but the analyses in relation to this air pollution levels are from Dr. Lebicki.
Adv. A. Amorai: This, these, these, just confirm to us that these are the important surgeries, as if without the results of the monitoring and the results of the materials that according to Lebiki, are excellent for the transfer of Haifa and the Bay. In fact, you have no basis for your opinion? Please
The Witness, Dr. Julie G: ...That's not true. That's just one part of my review. I also look at data, health data that are related to Haifa and that are not dependent on the data of air monitoring, and I also talk about the reports of the plaintiffs' experts, and this too has nothing to do with Lebiki's opinion.