The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: It's from Acwiki..
A: If I downloaded it to be trendy, it could be.
[...]
Q: If you put it in the review, You copied this to the opinion from the document which is one appendix to the approval requestThe one we brought you earlier, one appendix to the request for approval, we gave it to you by hand.
A: This?
Q: Nope. This. You're holding it now.
A: Yes, yes.
Q: This. Was it in front of your eyes and you copied it into your opinion?
A: From Acwiki, a meeting place on the subject of social ecology. It could be.
Q: Maybe. Maybe.
A: Maybe. Yes.
(Expanded, pp. 226-231) (and also on pages 216 and 233-235)
- Shlita was referred to an article on the EquiWiki website (Appendix 1 to his opinion) and he was asked as follows:
Q: And in one appendix to the request for confirmation that this is Equiwiki, an Equiwiki website, also appears Title on page 15, it is also written in 2007 that a report was published.
A: Yes. The report revealed.
Q: It's also copying, isn't it? Look at the screen, you can see on the screen.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: In the middle, it appears in your middle.
A: Yes, ok.
Q: It's also copyingRight?
A: Yes.
(p. 217).
- He was presented with the fact that there are 'gaps and discrepancies' between what is written in the article from the EquiWiki website that was quoted in his opinion, and what is actually presented in his opinion as follows:
Q: In your opinion it is written and there is a high suspicion that the air pollution originating from vehicles, And in EquiWiki it is written and there is a high suspicion that the source of the problem is. It's Slight change in wordsRight?
A: It could be.
Q: Who made this change? This is the only change in the first paragraph. Who made this change??
A: Can't tell you, I don't know.
Q: Isn't you?
A: What?
Q: Not you?