A: You say that with me...
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: There is no such thing, which begins and there is high suspicion. Sorry, and the report's authors claimed. The last 4 lines that were presented to you in Wiki do not appear in your. After and there is a high suspicion in your mind of air pollution originating from vehicles.
A: So maybe I was wrong there, I missed it. In any case, no one interfered in the preparation of the report.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: All right.
Q: You missed it.
A: It could be that I am.
Q: And it's just a case that you missed this sentence that says what you are, as opposed to what you claim in all your opinions? By chance, you missed this sentence?
A: No, I don't know how to say.
Adv. Mr. A. Amorai: I object to the question. I want to oppose the question. Because it's not true. It doesn't say the opposite of what he says.
[....]
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: The objection is rejected.
Adv. Mr. A. Amorai: Excuse me.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: The question is legitimate. confronts the witness, in the eye, with the fact that some passage is missing in his opinion and he is asked whether this missing passage may contradict his thesis. This is a legitimate question.
A: It could be.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Let him answer whatever he wants, thank you.
A: It could be missing, I can't tell you why right now.
Q: I asked if it was by chance.
A: Not because of a particular trend.
Q: Not because of a trend?
A: It's missing, it could be missing, I was wrong.
Q: What do you mean it could be? Why is it missing?
A: I don't know how to say.
Q: Look, you can't keep saying I was wrong, I was wrong, I was wrong. Let's explain how it was that your mistake happened? Is it a coincidence? Is it a coincidence that your mistake happened exactly on the sentence I say contradicts the thesis you present in your opinion?
A: I'm not presenting a thesis, I'm just copying what they wrote.