A: In retrospect, I know that the second part of what you said is trueBut at the same time, I think it's irrelevant to the common man because they don't do research.
Q: Because they don't do research.
A: Private people, private people are not scientists people, they are living. [...]
Q: In other words, you say that you know in retrospect that the second part of what I said, the meaning is that no substances are emitted into the environment when a flame risesBut what you're saying is that you understand that people are affected by the sight, even though they don't know if it's emitting into the environment or not, that's what you're saying?
A: I say that this is another of the things that scares them because not everyone knows it's not that and you know, people don't really believe in any factor these days, so the lack of trust causes you, them, to say, so they say it's burning.
Q: Who is it they say it's burning?
A: The audience in Israel and around the world, but I'm talking about Israel, has very, very low trust in public systems, certainly in economic systems that can tell them Aleph and Bet, so my assumption, I say discount, pay attention, That the fact that there's this torch there at night and it's shining brightly, you can see even in the picture, I guess it's seen as something threatening, even though we both know it's not actually the threatening time, which is even more invisible (page 1074).
Dr. Livki also testified in this context, among other things, that "...These flames, their function is actually to destroy the pollutants" (see pp. 1780-1781).
- Lahad clarified that the survey did not distinguish between the various polluting factors or between the various polluting bodies:
Q: I want to make sure, Are there any questions in your survey designed to distinguish between the effects of air pollution from sources? Transportation, to the effects of air pollution from sources Industrial plants?
A: Anonymous
Q: Nope. All right.