A: Okay.
Q: Now you will see the third section that I marked for you in yellow from their conclusions.
A: Yes.
Q: And confirm to me that what is written there is that while it is possible to identify the involvement of radicals in the cancerous process,
A: Yes.
Q: There is little information about the harmful role that radicals play in the complex process of cancer development that has yet to be discovered. The effect of oxidative stress in the cancer process is directly related to the type and concentration of the particular radical.
A: That's right.
Q: To know what type and what level of external stress is indeed a true biomarker of cancer incidence, Need a complex study of DNA mapping followed for several decades on healthy people who develop cancer. Right? All of this they say.
A: Right, right.
Q: So please confirm to me that according to this article, there is still not enough scientific knowledge and not enough information to link exposure to substances in the air or to substances in general, with the incidence of cancerRight?
A: That's right. As I said, there are other mechanisms, so I didn't rely only on the radicals.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: He asks, but only on the basis of this article.
A: Based on the radicals, no.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: In terms of this article?
A: As far as this article is concerned, noBut I proved, I brought from other mechanisms.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: All right.
Q: Okay. Not radicals.
A: Other mechanisms, that one may amplify the other.
(pp. 160-162).
- Shlita was referred to a third additional article mentioned on page 32 of his supplementary opinion, entitled "Free Radicals, Metals and Antioxidants" in relation to newborns [marked as Exhibit M/8] and he was asked and answered as follows:
Q: Does this article even talk about exposure to chemical substances?
A: At the moment I don't rememberI'll take a look. (Reader, Etnacha) No, he doesn't say chemical pollutants here.