With regard to plaintiffs 3-7, we will have before us the question of whether Goren delivered the lease contracts to their counsel, the transfer of a concealed hearing venue, and if so, whether the transfer of the hearing venue informed the plaintiffs about these contracts, and in particular with regard to section 15. Next, we will continue to examine whether, as the plaintiffs claim, there is a causal connection between the question of their knowledge of clause 15 at the time of the signing of the contracts and their signing of the contracts at that time. In other words, to the extent that it is determined that plaintiffs 3-7 did not know about clause 15 of the lease contract at the time they signed the contracts, would this have caused them to refrain from signing the contracts as they claimed, or would it have made no difference to them?
As for plaintiffs 1-2, in their case as well, we will seek to examine whether they knew that a lease contract had been signed with the manager, and in particular whether they knew about clause 15 of the lease contract, taking into account the fact that these plaintiffs were not represented by the transfer of a concealed hearing place, but rather were in direct contact with the transfer of the Goren hearing place.
After the chapter of conclusions regarding the degree of liability of the defendants, or some of them, each according to his share and the fruits of his alleged actions, taking into account their alleged role in the overall evidentiary set, I would like to elaborate on a few things regarding the individual plaintiffs 3-7. This is because it is interpreted that despite their desire to define themselves as a single group, the diversity that characterizes each of them dictates a separate legal conclusion.
Upon completion of the examination of the aforesaid, the essence and substance of the claim will arise and will come up, which will require the plaintiffs' alleged damage, both against the background of the remedies requested and against the background of the conclusions drawn in relation to the specific circumstances that are unique to each plaintiff's case.