A: They made allegations about this person
...
- Everyone who worked for him claimed that he was not a kosher person.
The Honorable Judge: Who is it? Who is this with him?
A: M. tea, his name is M. tea.
Honorable Judge: Wait, if you can give an answer, what was her answer to the question, is it true that you asked the National Insurance Institute for money on the basis of coupons that were forged, and in the end the National Insurance Institute also took the money back from you? Such a simple question. Wait, the answer is in Hebrew,
A: The National Insurance Institute asked for the money back" (para. 22 May 2024, pp. 15, paras. 1-27).
- She later claimed that she worked in the years 2011-2014 (ibid., pp. 16, 15-23), she did not present any coupons at all, and claimed that there were witnesses who could testify, family members and workers who worked, but she did not submit affidavits and did not summon them to testify because she was not summoned. In the NII document regarding the employment periods (Appendix F to the exhibits file), it was found that she worked for 9 months in 2011-2012, 10 months in 2014, and one month in 2020. There is no support for her claim that she saved money from work both before and during the marriage in light of the limited work periods. As for the living room, at most it began operating after the completion of the construction of the new house, which was completed in 2018. With regard to the workers, she claimed that she went to them and they did not let her (ibid., paras. 25-17, s. 3). This is a vague claim, which was not made beforehand, and as stated, no application was filed in the matter at any time.
- On the other hand, the Registrar attached invoices for the purchase of materials, concrete, including a pump, the coating of the building's stone, an accounting ledger for the purchase of building materials, and plumbing for the building, which prove his investment in the construction of the building (Appendices 18-24 to the appeal against the decision of the Registrar of the Collector).
- In his cross-examination, Ham claimed that the man did not participate in the construction costs at all, and that he himself financed the construction:
"Q: Didn't your son contribute anything to the construction of the house?