Q: That she will go
The Honorable Judge: That's all.
Q: To live in a rented apartment?
A: I didn't tell them about renting, not about anything.
Q: You told her that she would come and live in your apartment.
A: No.
Q: Right?
A: Wrong, not that we will give it to her, she will live with me, then, she will take my house.
The Honorable Judge: No,
A: You will live
The Honorable Judge: That's two questions.
A: This, it will live.
Honorable Judge: You told her father
A: Temporary,
Honorable Judge: That she can live in the house above you?
A: You will live temporarily until
The Honorable Judge: OK.
A: Let them get along.
Honorable Judge: OK, excellent.
...
Q: You mean that H. didn't know that she was in the house with the permission?
A: No, she knows she doesn't have a home.
Q: How does she know?
A: She knows she doesn't have a home, and her husband knows he doesn't have a home.
Q: Her husband knows, we'll leave it.
A: Well?
Q: How does she know she doesn't have a home?
A: What, I, I have to know, she'll know or not, it's my business?
Q: But she lives in an apartment.
A: She lives in a temporary apartment.
Q: How would she know that it was temporary?
A: Temporarily, she knows it's temporary.
Q: Did you tell her? When did you tell her?
A: She knows, what is it, I told her, didn't you tell her?" (ibid., pp. 38, s. 39-p. 39, s. 38).
Is the residence permit the pen?
- As stated, I was under the impression that the right given to the woman is of the "voluntary" type, i.e., a right without consideration and without a time limit. The validity of the right is fixed in case law, and it is permanent and can be revoked:
"A license granted without consideration can be revoked in the blink of an eye upon the landowner's declaration that he does not wish to continue granting the license." (Civil Appeal 602/84 Yosef Rivo v. Avraham Gal (published in the databases, [published in Nevo], October 2, 1985). This ruling was reiterated by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal 9261/05 (published in Nevo on April 2, 2006) when it held: "Even if the District Court accepts their claim that an implicit license was created in the land by virtue of their many years of holding, it is a free license that the licensee may withdraw at any time (see, for example, Civil Appeal Authority 1156/02 Khir v. Lidai, IsrSC 57(3) 949)" (references in the judgment in the Supreme Court (Kiryat Shmona) 7228-02-22 S.A. v. P.A., [Nevo], July 18, 2023).