With regard to the petition for a balance of resources not in a half-way so that the defendant will be given a larger share, the plaintiff argued that the income gaps according to CPA Rusnak do not justify this; The plaintiff referred to the fact that during the marriage the defendant set aside to a study fund and a fund what was not done by the plaintiff, to the defendant the potential to earn from private lessons that is not exhaustive. The defendant did not contribute to the establishment of the business andits operation, and in the division of duties, it was the plaintiff who stayed at home with the minor. It was emphasized that both parties had worked throughout the marriage and are expected to continue working. It was argued that the parties made an equal contribution in the house, and their contribution was swallowed up by the resources they accumulated jointly, so that just as the plaintiff does not demand from the defendant a refund of the money he earned over, the defendant cannot demand the return of the money of her inheritance.
With regard to the redeemed study fund, it was claimed that it was used to cover a debit balance in the joint account and that the expert opinion for balancing resources should be adopted; with regard to the dissolution of a partnership in movables, the court was asked to order the dissolution of the partnership by means of two lists; the sale of the vehicle and the division of the proceeds into equal parts. The court was also asked that the parties continue to pay the loan taken from the "XX" company in equal parts, the defendant will return the sum of NIS 3,340 that was taken from the joint account after the date of the rupture and the sharing of the apartment will be dissolved immediately.
It was further argued that the defendant should be obligated to pay half of the tax payments required by the authorities for the joint period, the sum of NIS 7,833 + NIS 6,436, as well as the sum of NIS 1,500 for the difference that the plaintiff paid in excess to cover the mandatory balances. As for the trip abroad, it was claimed that it was a work trip that took place 3 months before the rupture, and that the trip was agreed upon jointly by the parties.